IMPROVING LEARNING AND ACTIVITIES ABILITY TO READ UNDERSTANDING THROUGH THE DISCUSSION SCRAMBLE METHOD IN LEARNING INDONESIAN

Authors

  • Panji Maulana STKIP SEBELAS APRIL

Keywords:

Scramble discourse methods, Reading comprehension, Indonesian

Abstract

This research is motivated by the lack of students' reading comprehension skills. To improve reading comprehension skills, teachers must design learning specifically, especially the application of learning methods, to improve reading comprehension skills. Efforts to do is to apply the discourse scramble method. The formulation of this problem is “Can the use of the scramble method of discourse improve student activity and learning outcomes in reading comprehension of grade IV SDN Cimanggung III students in 2018/2019?”

This study uses a classroom action research model which is characterized by a cycle. In one cycle consists of four stages of activities namely planning, implementing, acting, observing, and reflecting. the number of students who become research subjects totals 25 people.

Of the 25 students in the observation cycle 1 learning activities the results of the study showed that the use of the scramble method of discourse could improve student learning activities and outcomes. This can be seen from the results of students' mastery in reading comprehension skills in Indonesian language learning from the initial data, 12% or 3 students, cycle I, 36% or 9 students, cycle II, 92% 23 students. Student learning activity data initial conditions, 53, cycle I, 70, cycle II, 82. While the results of the teaching activity of the teacher initial data are 64.4 cycle I, 84 and cycle II, 86.7. Thus, the results obtained from this study that the use of the scramble method of discourse greatly supports the improvement of the process and student learning outcomes in reading comprehension material.

References

Arifin, Z. 2013. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip Teknik Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bahri, SD. dan Zain, A. 2006. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gulo, W. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

belajaran. Refika Aditama.

Jihad, A. dan Haris, A. 2008. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta

Hanafiah, N. dan Suhana, C. 2009. Konsep Strategi Pem

: Multi Pressindo.

Nawawi. H. 2003. Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Rahayu, Sri. 2013. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Masalah Sosial Di Lingkungan Sekitar Di Kelas IV Sdn Cikole Kecamatan Cimalaka Kabupaten Sumedang”. Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (Online), (http://repository.upi.edu/5324/, diakses Tanggal 24 Januari 2019).

Rusman. 2012. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Slameto. 2013. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Subana dan Sudrajat. 2001. Dasar-dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Subana, Rahardi dan Sudrajat. 2005. Statistik Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

———-, N. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

———-. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryabrata, S. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sukardi. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktinya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Usman, H dan Stiady, P. 2006. Pengantar Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Uno, H.B. 2008. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Patty. 2015. Model Pembelajaran Scramble .(Online), http://pattyanox.blogspot.co.id/2015/09/model-pembelajaran-scramble.html, diakses Tanggal 24 Januari 2016).

Pribadi, B.A. 2010. Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Published

2020-02-18